Truth needs no proof.
One needs discernment to discover it in one’s heart. I wish people would read the KJV, but not ONLY. If you know the Truth you can’t be afraid of falsehood, you’ll recognize it & it will only strengthen your faith. I don’t know how to put it mildly but I’ll try – don’t just disregard other versions before you even read them. If compared to the KJV (which you elevated so high), they seem untrustworthy that’s fine, yet – bare in mind there are other languages (including the original tongues) which you aren’t familiar with.
For my part, I can tell you that I’ve read better versions… and they too without a doubt have been tampered with…
The Holy Spirit will guide you.
Don’t forget, that there are many people who don’t even speak English, to assume that God has left them without a guidance is more then naive.
Peace be on you!
I don’t need proof. As I stated, and is it not more than naive to incorrectly claim that the King James has not been translated into other languages, because you will find it has, Unfortunately many languages have been translated from the vulgate also.
There is an argument to claim that English was also the 7th language the word of God was translated into, that is translated from the original greek/hebrew as many of the numerous languages leading up to English translation were translated from the Latin only, which would invalidate them.
Some claim it Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Latin, German, and then English as 7th.
I’m not claiming that KJV hasn’t been translated into other languages, merely that it is only a translation. Other languages did not need to have their translations obtained through KJV, they got it from the original sources as well, many of them long before the KJV. Of course there are junk versions like everywhere else…
Don’t get me wrong, when it comes to English, I regard KJV to be the best of the rest. The beauty, subtleties and accuracy of the archaic language is essential, but I’ve got Bibles in my ‘mother tongue’ too and the situation there is the same – newer and revised version are heavily corrupted… yet when I look into the archaic texts (which sadly not many people read) the translation is a lot better, even then the KJV.
Do you think, for example, that the Christian Arabs or Armenians or Georgians should use a Bible translated from the KJV and not the ones they’re already using?
Best Regards
Whose mother and whose tongue?
Well lets say for example the Georgian Bible translated in the 5th century in Constantinople! Constantinople was the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire. What source do you think they used??? The Vulgate I reckon.
The Catholic Latin Vulgate was created before both the Georgian and Armenian Bible.
Let’s take a look at the Armenian Bible what does it say…
The Armenian Bible was first published in 425 AD and was based on copies of the Bible brought from Constantinople.
The Latin translated Vulgate Catholic Bible came out late 4th century, around 383 AD. So decades before both of these. And there translations were based on stuff that come from Constantinople. (Roman Empire)
In fact it was the Roman Empire that allowed the Armenians to convert to christianity in 301 AD.
The Roman Empire is considered to have publicly allowed for Christian worship about ten years after that date.
I would suggest that the Armenian Bible which came from Constantinople a 100 years later was also approved by the Roman Empire.
So the tongue your listening to, whose mother is it?
For example The Armenian Apostolic Church is by a long way the most popular religion in Armenia today,
look below, they sound like catholic Roman Empire to me.
‘Latinizations are common in both the Armenian Apostolic and Armenian Catholic usage of the Armenian Rite. Among those shared by both groups are the adoption of benediction, confessionals, holy water, the Stations of the Cross, and the rosary.’
I rest my case. The more I dig, the more obvious it becomes.
If the Lord has no preserved word, then he is a failure and satan wins. Those who tell you this word is mistranslated are usually unbelievers and satanists. Thayer’s Lexicon (he was a unitarian) who did not believe in the Deity of Christ and his word definitions reflect this. Then others claim the bible has “errors” Just because you do not understand something does not make it an error.
I went to Bible college 6 years with a masters and never really learned Greek or Hebrew. Yet what books do we use to learn these languages The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (10 Volume Set) by Gerhard Kittel is an absolute standard in seminaries. Kittel was an early member of the Nazi party a supporter of Hitler. What Bible colleges did Hitler start?
Before we start using these lexicons to understand what words mean, maybe we should find out what these authors believe. Do we want to learn Greek from a Nazi or a believer like Martin Luther flawed as he might be
the brown driver briggs Lexicon has Briggs who taught Messianic prediction has not and cannot be fulfilled.
in other words Jesus is not the Christ his idea anyways, so Jesus is not his Christ.
WHO WROTE THE BIBLE?
“Evil people or devils would not have written the Bible, because it condemns them and their works.
Good people or angels could not have written the Bible, because by saying that it was from God while it was their own fabrication, would have made them guilty of deception and therefore they could not have been good. The only being that remains who could have written it, is GOD.” – FLAVEL
The Bible contains the mind of God, the state of man, the way of salvation, the doom of sinners and the happiness of believers. Its doctrines are holy, its precepts are binding, its histories are true, and its decisions are immutable. Read it to be wise, believe it to be safe and practice it to be holy. It contains light to direct you, food to support you and comfort to cheer you. It is the traveler’s map, the pilgrim’s staff, the pilot’s compass, the soldier’s sword and the Christian’s character.
Here paradise is restored, heaven opened and the gates of hell disclosed. Christ is its grand object, our good is its design and the glory of God its end. It should fill the memory, rule the heart, and guide the feet. Read it slowly, frequently, and prayerfully.
It is given you in life and will be opened in the judgment and will be remembered forever. It involves the highest responsibility, will reward the greatest labor, and will condemn all who trifle with its sacred contents. (you can trust the King James Bible)
-Author Unknown
Wow, I didn’t know about those first 6 versions, or how they all came together to bring the finished authorized version. I think of all who gave their lives completing the most important work there could ever be…THE LIVING WORDS OF GOD. They are with Him in paradise now! As we continue to share those timeless truths…(choked up, thinking of meeting our King face to face) we too will give our lives, if need be, defending and sharing it, praying it brings more to Him while there’s still time…. THANKS HUGO! BLESS YOU! –one in the process of being refined
Hi Hugo, been banned on your Telegram account for some reason… Wanted to ask if you could do video reviewing the 10 commandments according to KJV and the other more modern 10 commandments used in religious organisations.. 😊 Been listening to you for years and loved the progress 😍 God bless
Arrangements for this version were completed by the appointment of fifty-four learned men, who were also to secure the suggestions of all competent persons, that, as the king put it, “our said translation may have the help and furtherance of all our principal learned men within this our kingdom.” This attitude of the king, the removal of their first suspicions, and the undoubted merits of the case, brought about a hearty acquiescence on the part of those who had at first opposed the movement. His Majesty’s instructions to the translators were these:
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE TRANSLATORS.
The ordinary Bible read in the Church, commonly called the Bishops’ Bible, to be followed, and as little altered as the original will permit.
The names of the prophets and the holy writers, with the other names in the text, to be retained, as near as may be, accordingly as they are vulgarly used.
The old ecclesiastical words to be kept, as the word church, not to be translated congregation.
When any word hath divers significations, that to be kept which hath been most commonly used by the most eminent fathers, being agreeable to the propriety of the place and the analogies of faith.
The division of chapters to be altered either not at all, or as little as may be, if necessity so require.
No marginal notes at all to be affixed, but only for the explanation of the Hebrew or Greek words, which cannot, without some circumlocution, so briefly and fitly be expressed, in the text.
Such quotations of places to be marginally set down as shall serve for the fit reference of one Scripture to another.
Every particular man of each company to take the same chapter or chapters; and, having translated or amended them severally by himself where he thinks good, all to meet together to confirm what they have done, and agree for their part what shall stand.
As any one company hath dispatched any one book in this manner, they shall send it to the rest, to be considered of seriously and judiciously; for his Majesty is very careful on this point.
If any company, upon the review of the book so sent, shall doubt or differ upon any places, to send them word thereof, to note the places, and therewithal to send their reasons; to which if they consent not, the difference to be compounded at the general meeting, which is to be of the chief persons of each company, at the end of the work.
When any place of special obscurity is doubted of, letters to be directed by authority to send to any learned man in the land for his judgment of such a place.
Letters to be sent from every bishop to the rest of his clergy, admonishing them of this translation in hand, and to move and charge as many as, being skillful in the tongues, have taken pains in that kind, to send their particular observations to the company, either at Westminster, Cambridge, or Oxford, according as it was directed before in the king’s letter to the archbishop.
The directors in each company to be the Deans of Westminster and Chester, for Westminster, and the king’s professors in Hebrew and Greek in the two universities.
These translations to be used, when they agree better with the text than the Bishops’ Bible: Tyndale’s, Coverdale’s, Matthew’s [Rogers’], Whitchurch’s* [Cranmer’s], Geneva.”
By a later rule, “three or four of the most ancient and grave divines, in either of the universities, not employed in translating, to be assigned to be overseers of the translation, for the better observation of the fourth rule.”
*By “Witchurch” is meant the Great Bible, which was printed by Edward Witchurch, one of King Henry VIII’s printers.
Only forty-seven of the men appointed for this work are known to have engaged in it. These were divided into six companies, two of which met at Oxford, two at Cambridge, and two at Westminster. They were presided over severally by the Dean of Westminster and by the two Hebrew Professors of the Universities.
Well, after an hour of digging you rest your case?
I haven’t even looked into “The Historical” sources. I don’t have much reasons to trust History. Armenians and Georgians are mostly Eastern Orthodox and I doubt they’d have embraced the Catholic translations. I haven’t read their bibles, so I can’t talk about what’s in them, but the point was – King James Bible is not the primal source.
As for me – I speak several Slavic Languages including Russian. There were no Catholics where I was born and I can confirm that the Old Slavonic Bible is not translated from any Latin, but directly from Greek sources. The Septuagint in English however (at least the two versions I’ve seen) does NOT match the Slavonic version.
And before you start bashing the Orthodoxy, I’m not promoting any Christian denomination – the organized religions are all under Satanic rule.
I’ve been to Nazareth years ago – almost the entire population there is still Christian, are you telling me they should read their bible translated from KJV? Or the Greeks?
The Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, but it was so impure that it has to undergo 16 centuries purification until it reaches it’s perfect state in another language???
Do you really believe that?
I think the Word of God comes clear enough to start with and whatever happens after, won’t bring any improvements, but I guess we’ll find out some day:
“And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”
Revelation 19:13
Until then – don’t be so eager to assert the sublime superiority of KJV.
Yes 100%. I more than believe it. I know it is.
Its very simple, let me explain.
The reason God didn’t use English the first time is the same reason God didn’t use Greek the first time for the old testament…the reason being both languages hadn’t developed to a stable form or for universal use at that specific time.
Its the same reason why you don’t go to a nursery school now, you changed, you got older, things evolved, time moved on, things changed, the worlds population got bigger, technology has improved. Languages change.
Its obvious is it not?
Thanks Hugo. I appreciate your work on many of your videos that I have watched/listened to.
This video (like many of yours) prompted me to think:
If 7 stands for completion,
If the 7th version is the pure completed one,
Then why would God finish his work of making the Earth on the 6th day?
Why couldn’t it be that God completed the work of making the Earth on the 7th day?
If scripture says “upon completion” he rested, then it sounds like at the moment completion was arrived at, he rested.
Does scripture actually say that God did not work on the 7th day? It doesn’t seem to say that rest is all he did that day. It seems to say “upon completion” that day, as if he completed things that 7th day and then immediately rested afterwards.
If God completed (brought to perfection) his work on the 6th day, then wouldn’t it make sense that the 6th English version would be more pure than the 7th?
According to Etymonline, “completion (n.) “act of bringing to a desired end, consummation, full development,” late 14c., complecioun, from Medieval Latin completionem (nominative completio), noun of action from past participle stem of Latin complere “to fill up, complete,” from com-, here probably as an intensive prefix (see com-), + plere “to fill” (from PIE root *pele- (1) “to fill”).”
Interestingly, the word “people” also comes from “to fill.” [Etymonline] Since people were supposedly made on the sixth day, that would I guess support the idea of the work of making the world being completed on the sixth day, I guess, but I have not given this enough thought yet to have a conclusion about it.
Anyway, I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
There is no doubt about 7 meaning completion in scripture.
There are loads more examples here are some more
God created the world in 7 days (Genesis 1)
Noah brought 7 pairs of clean animals onto the ark (Genesis 7:2)
There are 7 years of plenty and 7 years of famine in Pharaoh’s dream (Genesis 41)
Jacob had to work 7 years to marry Rachel (Genesis 29:20)
There were 7 times Naaman had to dip in the Jordan to be cleansed from leprosy (2 Kings 5:10)
Samson had 7 locks of hair which gave him his strength (Judges 16)
In the New Testament, Jesus spoke of forgiveness “not just seven times, but seventy times seven” (Matthew 18:22). This indicates unlimited forgiveness. He fed the 4,000 with 7 loaves of bread and fish (Matthew 15:34-38).
In Revelation, there are 7 churches, 7 spirits, 7 golden lampstands, 7 stars, 7 seals, 7 trumpets, and 7 bowls.
All throughout Scripture, God incorporates the number 7 when revealing himself.
And he is revealing himself through scripture through the word of the King James Bible which not only has been preserved for over 400 years, but was also purified/refined 7 times.
PSALMS 12:6 KJV “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”
Childish, – The first creation account is divided into seven days during which God creates light (day 1); the sky (day 2); the earth, seas, and vegetation (day 3); the sun and moon (day 4); animals of the air and sea (day 5); and land animals and humans (day 6). God rested from his work on the seventh day of creation, the Sabbath.
What’s obvious to one isn’t necessarily obvious to others…
I’m not here to change your mind, that is impossible without God’s will anyway, I’m here, because I agree with the things you say on your channel in general. When I disagree with something (like your position on the superiority of KJV), I feel compelled to acknowledge it, in hope that it will give you different perspective. I’m not gonna keep pestering you with more (obvious to me reasons) of why KJV isn’t as purified and immaculate as you deem it to be. I could start picking up verses and matching them with the text I’ve got, but that would have been pointless unless you can verify it yourself…
Anyway, I’m glad I’ve found your website, may the Holy Spirit guide you!
Be blessed!
I appreciate your work hugo an you’ve steered me in the right direction way back from the covid days, like I’m talking way back when it all kicked off. It really was you who convinced me to not take the jab so I’m grateful for that. As you kept putting out content, it really did seem the media was pushing us away from jesus/god, but now the they have done a full u turn an I get what your saying in your other video about them getting in between us an the bible, do they know something we don’t? Why are they pushing this now? Why not last year or the year before, joe rogan,Peterson etc, why now? Is something about to happen in regards to god? What your take on it?
Did you see the bishop in Sydney get attacked by an extremist? Islam (again) government open boarder policy from U.K., America etc they are pouring i migrants for something big? Race wars within? Alternative media pushing this I believe, they want Christian’s to “fight back” Did you notice the films that are due out …. “Civil war” “Fallout” like come on? Right on schedule as it seems no? Mad world this my friend.
Hugo Talks 
Thank u Hugo ❤️ 🙏 ✝️
LikeLike
Great video as always Hugo many thanks. Just watched: A lamp in the dark, Tare amongst the wheat and Bridge to Babylon. Very interesting..
LikeLike
Truth needs no proof.
One needs discernment to discover it in one’s heart. I wish people would read the KJV, but not ONLY. If you know the Truth you can’t be afraid of falsehood, you’ll recognize it & it will only strengthen your faith. I don’t know how to put it mildly but I’ll try – don’t just disregard other versions before you even read them. If compared to the KJV (which you elevated so high), they seem untrustworthy that’s fine, yet – bare in mind there are other languages (including the original tongues) which you aren’t familiar with.
For my part, I can tell you that I’ve read better versions… and they too without a doubt have been tampered with…
The Holy Spirit will guide you.
Don’t forget, that there are many people who don’t even speak English, to assume that God has left them without a guidance is more then naive.
Peace be on you!
LikeLike
I don’t need proof. As I stated, and is it not more than naive to incorrectly claim that the King James has not been translated into other languages, because you will find it has, Unfortunately many languages have been translated from the vulgate also.
There is an argument to claim that English was also the 7th language the word of God was translated into, that is translated from the original greek/hebrew as many of the numerous languages leading up to English translation were translated from the Latin only, which would invalidate them.
Some claim it Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Latin, German, and then English as 7th.
LikeLike
I’m not claiming that KJV hasn’t been translated into other languages, merely that it is only a translation. Other languages did not need to have their translations obtained through KJV, they got it from the original sources as well, many of them long before the KJV. Of course there are junk versions like everywhere else…
Don’t get me wrong, when it comes to English, I regard KJV to be the best of the rest. The beauty, subtleties and accuracy of the archaic language is essential, but I’ve got Bibles in my ‘mother tongue’ too and the situation there is the same – newer and revised version are heavily corrupted… yet when I look into the archaic texts (which sadly not many people read) the translation is a lot better, even then the KJV.
Do you think, for example, that the Christian Arabs or Armenians or Georgians should use a Bible translated from the KJV and not the ones they’re already using?
Best Regards
LikeLike
Whose mother and whose tongue?
Well lets say for example the Georgian Bible translated in the 5th century in Constantinople! Constantinople was the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire. What source do you think they used??? The Vulgate I reckon.
The Catholic Latin Vulgate was created before both the Georgian and Armenian Bible.
Let’s take a look at the Armenian Bible what does it say…
The Armenian Bible was first published in 425 AD and was based on copies of the Bible brought from Constantinople.
The Latin translated Vulgate Catholic Bible came out late 4th century, around 383 AD. So decades before both of these. And there translations were based on stuff that come from Constantinople. (Roman Empire)
In fact it was the Roman Empire that allowed the Armenians to convert to christianity in 301 AD.
The Roman Empire is considered to have publicly allowed for Christian worship about ten years after that date.
I would suggest that the Armenian Bible which came from Constantinople a 100 years later was also approved by the Roman Empire.
So the tongue your listening to, whose mother is it?
For example The Armenian Apostolic Church is by a long way the most popular religion in Armenia today,
look below, they sound like catholic Roman Empire to me.
‘Latinizations are common in both the Armenian Apostolic and Armenian Catholic usage of the Armenian Rite. Among those shared by both groups are the adoption of benediction, confessionals, holy water, the Stations of the Cross, and the rosary.’
I rest my case. The more I dig, the more obvious it becomes.
LikeLike
Koine Greek was the original language the New Testament was written in.
Nice song. God bless, Hugo.
LikeLike
If the Lord has no preserved word, then he is a failure and satan wins. Those who tell you this word is mistranslated are usually unbelievers and satanists. Thayer’s Lexicon (he was a unitarian) who did not believe in the Deity of Christ and his word definitions reflect this. Then others claim the bible has “errors” Just because you do not understand something does not make it an error.
I went to Bible college 6 years with a masters and never really learned Greek or Hebrew. Yet what books do we use to learn these languages The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (10 Volume Set) by Gerhard Kittel is an absolute standard in seminaries. Kittel was an early member of the Nazi party a supporter of Hitler. What Bible colleges did Hitler start?
Before we start using these lexicons to understand what words mean, maybe we should find out what these authors believe. Do we want to learn Greek from a Nazi or a believer like Martin Luther flawed as he might be
the brown driver briggs Lexicon has Briggs who taught Messianic prediction has not and cannot be fulfilled.
in other words Jesus is not the Christ his idea anyways, so Jesus is not his Christ.
LikeLike
WHO WROTE THE BIBLE?
“Evil people or devils would not have written the Bible, because it condemns them and their works.
Good people or angels could not have written the Bible, because by saying that it was from God while it was their own fabrication, would have made them guilty of deception and therefore they could not have been good. The only being that remains who could have written it, is GOD.” – FLAVEL
LikeLike
The Bible contains the mind of God, the state of man, the way of salvation, the doom of sinners and the happiness of believers. Its doctrines are holy, its precepts are binding, its histories are true, and its decisions are immutable. Read it to be wise, believe it to be safe and practice it to be holy. It contains light to direct you, food to support you and comfort to cheer you. It is the traveler’s map, the pilgrim’s staff, the pilot’s compass, the soldier’s sword and the Christian’s character.
Here paradise is restored, heaven opened and the gates of hell disclosed. Christ is its grand object, our good is its design and the glory of God its end. It should fill the memory, rule the heart, and guide the feet. Read it slowly, frequently, and prayerfully.
It is given you in life and will be opened in the judgment and will be remembered forever. It involves the highest responsibility, will reward the greatest labor, and will condemn all who trifle with its sacred contents. (you can trust the King James Bible)
-Author Unknown
LikeLike
Wow, I didn’t know about those first 6 versions, or how they all came together to bring the finished authorized version. I think of all who gave their lives completing the most important work there could ever be…THE LIVING WORDS OF GOD. They are with Him in paradise now! As we continue to share those timeless truths…(choked up, thinking of meeting our King face to face) we too will give our lives, if need be, defending and sharing it, praying it brings more to Him while there’s still time…. THANKS HUGO! BLESS YOU! –one in the process of being refined
LikeLike
Hi Hugo, been banned on your Telegram account for some reason… Wanted to ask if you could do video reviewing the 10 commandments according to KJV and the other more modern 10 commandments used in religious organisations.. 😊 Been listening to you for years and loved the progress 😍 God bless
LikeLike
It seems all 17,000 subscribers are banned from commenting
LikeLike
KING JAMES’ INSTRUCTIONS TO THE TRANSLATORS
Arrangements for this version were completed by the appointment of fifty-four learned men, who were also to secure the suggestions of all competent persons, that, as the king put it, “our said translation may have the help and furtherance of all our principal learned men within this our kingdom.” This attitude of the king, the removal of their first suspicions, and the undoubted merits of the case, brought about a hearty acquiescence on the part of those who had at first opposed the movement. His Majesty’s instructions to the translators were these:
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE TRANSLATORS.
The names of the prophets and the holy writers, with the other names in the text, to be retained, as near as may be, accordingly as they are vulgarly used.
The old ecclesiastical words to be kept, as the word church, not to be translated congregation.
When any word hath divers significations, that to be kept which hath been most commonly used by the most eminent fathers, being agreeable to the propriety of the place and the analogies of faith.
The division of chapters to be altered either not at all, or as little as may be, if necessity so require.
No marginal notes at all to be affixed, but only for the explanation of the Hebrew or Greek words, which cannot, without some circumlocution, so briefly and fitly be expressed, in the text.
Such quotations of places to be marginally set down as shall serve for the fit reference of one Scripture to another.
Every particular man of each company to take the same chapter or chapters; and, having translated or amended them severally by himself where he thinks good, all to meet together to confirm what they have done, and agree for their part what shall stand.
As any one company hath dispatched any one book in this manner, they shall send it to the rest, to be considered of seriously and judiciously; for his Majesty is very careful on this point.
If any company, upon the review of the book so sent, shall doubt or differ upon any places, to send them word thereof, to note the places, and therewithal to send their reasons; to which if they consent not, the difference to be compounded at the general meeting, which is to be of the chief persons of each company, at the end of the work.
When any place of special obscurity is doubted of, letters to be directed by authority to send to any learned man in the land for his judgment of such a place.
Letters to be sent from every bishop to the rest of his clergy, admonishing them of this translation in hand, and to move and charge as many as, being skillful in the tongues, have taken pains in that kind, to send their particular observations to the company, either at Westminster, Cambridge, or Oxford, according as it was directed before in the king’s letter to the archbishop.
The directors in each company to be the Deans of Westminster and Chester, for Westminster, and the king’s professors in Hebrew and Greek in the two universities.
These translations to be used, when they agree better with the text than the Bishops’ Bible: Tyndale’s, Coverdale’s, Matthew’s [Rogers’], Whitchurch’s* [Cranmer’s], Geneva.”
By a later rule, “three or four of the most ancient and grave divines, in either of the universities, not employed in translating, to be assigned to be overseers of the translation, for the better observation of the fourth rule.”
*By “Witchurch” is meant the Great Bible, which was printed by Edward Witchurch, one of King Henry VIII’s printers.
Only forty-seven of the men appointed for this work are known to have engaged in it. These were divided into six companies, two of which met at Oxford, two at Cambridge, and two at Westminster. They were presided over severally by the Dean of Westminster and by the two Hebrew Professors of the Universities.
Source: http://www.bible-researcher.com/kjvhist.html
LikeLike
Well, after an hour of digging you rest your case?
I haven’t even looked into “The Historical” sources. I don’t have much reasons to trust History. Armenians and Georgians are mostly Eastern Orthodox and I doubt they’d have embraced the Catholic translations. I haven’t read their bibles, so I can’t talk about what’s in them, but the point was – King James Bible is not the primal source.
As for me – I speak several Slavic Languages including Russian. There were no Catholics where I was born and I can confirm that the Old Slavonic Bible is not translated from any Latin, but directly from Greek sources. The Septuagint in English however (at least the two versions I’ve seen) does NOT match the Slavonic version.
And before you start bashing the Orthodoxy, I’m not promoting any Christian denomination – the organized religions are all under Satanic rule.
I’ve been to Nazareth years ago – almost the entire population there is still Christian, are you telling me they should read their bible translated from KJV? Or the Greeks?
LikeLike
The Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, but it was so impure that it has to undergo 16 centuries purification until it reaches it’s perfect state in another language???
Do you really believe that?
I think the Word of God comes clear enough to start with and whatever happens after, won’t bring any improvements, but I guess we’ll find out some day:
“And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”
Revelation 19:13
Until then – don’t be so eager to assert the sublime superiority of KJV.
LikeLike
Yes 100%. I more than believe it. I know it is.
Its very simple, let me explain.
The reason God didn’t use English the first time is the same reason God didn’t use Greek the first time for the old testament…the reason being both languages hadn’t developed to a stable form or for universal use at that specific time.
Its the same reason why you don’t go to a nursery school now, you changed, you got older, things evolved, time moved on, things changed, the worlds population got bigger, technology has improved. Languages change.
Its obvious is it not?
LikeLike
Repent! Repent! Only Jesus Can Save Us!
LikeLike
Thanks Hugo. I appreciate your work on many of your videos that I have watched/listened to.
This video (like many of yours) prompted me to think:
If 7 stands for completion,
If the 7th version is the pure completed one,
Then why would God finish his work of making the Earth on the 6th day?
Why couldn’t it be that God completed the work of making the Earth on the 7th day?
If scripture says “upon completion” he rested, then it sounds like at the moment completion was arrived at, he rested.
Does scripture actually say that God did not work on the 7th day? It doesn’t seem to say that rest is all he did that day. It seems to say “upon completion” that day, as if he completed things that 7th day and then immediately rested afterwards.
If God completed (brought to perfection) his work on the 6th day, then wouldn’t it make sense that the 6th English version would be more pure than the 7th?
According to Etymonline, “completion (n.) “act of bringing to a desired end, consummation, full development,” late 14c., complecioun, from Medieval Latin completionem (nominative completio), noun of action from past participle stem of Latin complere “to fill up, complete,” from com-, here probably as an intensive prefix (see com-), + plere “to fill” (from PIE root *pele- (1) “to fill”).”
Interestingly, the word “people” also comes from “to fill.” [Etymonline] Since people were supposedly made on the sixth day, that would I guess support the idea of the work of making the world being completed on the sixth day, I guess, but I have not given this enough thought yet to have a conclusion about it.
Anyway, I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
LikeLike
There is no doubt about 7 meaning completion in scripture.
There are loads more examples here are some more
God created the world in 7 days (Genesis 1)
Noah brought 7 pairs of clean animals onto the ark (Genesis 7:2)
There are 7 years of plenty and 7 years of famine in Pharaoh’s dream (Genesis 41)
Jacob had to work 7 years to marry Rachel (Genesis 29:20)
There were 7 times Naaman had to dip in the Jordan to be cleansed from leprosy (2 Kings 5:10)
Samson had 7 locks of hair which gave him his strength (Judges 16)
In the New Testament, Jesus spoke of forgiveness “not just seven times, but seventy times seven” (Matthew 18:22). This indicates unlimited forgiveness. He fed the 4,000 with 7 loaves of bread and fish (Matthew 15:34-38).
In Revelation, there are 7 churches, 7 spirits, 7 golden lampstands, 7 stars, 7 seals, 7 trumpets, and 7 bowls.
All throughout Scripture, God incorporates the number 7 when revealing himself.
And he is revealing himself through scripture through the word of the King James Bible which not only has been preserved for over 400 years, but was also purified/refined 7 times.
PSALMS 12:6 KJV “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”
LikeLike
GOD created the world in 6 days, Hugo.
LikeLike
Childish, – The first creation account is divided into seven days during which God creates light (day 1); the sky (day 2); the earth, seas, and vegetation (day 3); the sun and moon (day 4); animals of the air and sea (day 5); and land animals and humans (day 6). God rested from his work on the seventh day of creation, the Sabbath.
LikeLike
What’s obvious to one isn’t necessarily obvious to others…
I’m not here to change your mind, that is impossible without God’s will anyway, I’m here, because I agree with the things you say on your channel in general. When I disagree with something (like your position on the superiority of KJV), I feel compelled to acknowledge it, in hope that it will give you different perspective. I’m not gonna keep pestering you with more (obvious to me reasons) of why KJV isn’t as purified and immaculate as you deem it to be. I could start picking up verses and matching them with the text I’ve got, but that would have been pointless unless you can verify it yourself…
Anyway, I’m glad I’ve found your website, may the Holy Spirit guide you!
Be blessed!
LikeLike
Words have been changed from the Genesis Bible.
LikeLike
Why is there no sound on here anymore?
LikeLike
I appreciate your work hugo an you’ve steered me in the right direction way back from the covid days, like I’m talking way back when it all kicked off. It really was you who convinced me to not take the jab so I’m grateful for that. As you kept putting out content, it really did seem the media was pushing us away from jesus/god, but now the they have done a full u turn an I get what your saying in your other video about them getting in between us an the bible, do they know something we don’t? Why are they pushing this now? Why not last year or the year before, joe rogan,Peterson etc, why now? Is something about to happen in regards to god? What your take on it?
Did you see the bishop in Sydney get attacked by an extremist? Islam (again) government open boarder policy from U.K., America etc they are pouring i migrants for something big? Race wars within? Alternative media pushing this I believe, they want Christian’s to “fight back” Did you notice the films that are due out …. “Civil war” “Fallout” like come on? Right on schedule as it seems no? Mad world this my friend.
LikeLike