CAR Speed Limiter Device = AUTOMATED FINES / Hugo Talks
Having driven around Boston in the US before, i can see the appeal of limiting some people’s speeds (the ones who tailgate at 90 mph) – but then think of the times when you need a sudden burst of speed, to avoid a collision or whatever. These devices would be more expensive, and less helpful, than decent driving instruction.
Besides, the real reason for them is to be able to shut down any motorist whose social credit score drops below Double-Plus Good.
Loading... 
Watch it these days, they get you 60 to 30 zone, if your doing 35mph or above as you cross the 30mph sign your screwed, driving HGV got to be super careful these days, know a fellow truther, 3 fines 35mph doing this in the last few months.
Although the limiter will restrict your speed on hitting the 30zone, you could still be doing 60 and still get fined, don’t worry they won’t lose there fine revenue.
I’m actually for Speed Limiters in cars related to the GPS area your in, so no huge issue, just the heavy handed fining.
Speeding, kills an infinite amount more people every year than Convid does 🙂
Russia declared WW3 ( alledegly according to news in India ) has already begun, think there miffed at losing there ship so easily, and the west supplying weapons that have killed possible 20K of there soldiers and turned most of there tanks to scrap, leaving them wide open for the yanks to invade! ( then they’ll bring out there good kit no doubt and better trained troops )
Loading...
Regardless of the control aspect of this measure, speed is unrelated to safety. What accounts for accidents is not speed in itself but instead distracted or impaired driving or vehicles which are poorly maintained; speed is only a force multiplier to these factors. Most of today’s vehicles are FAR safer at high speeds than they ever were in the history of automobiles with safety equipment up the yin yang and increased braking and suspension components as well as tire construction. The notion that speed kills is a myth. Attaching an environmental agenda to the issue is a cheap way to guilt many people into accepting Draconian spy devices on their vehicles. I will remain with my older vehicles if that’s the case (most newer vehicles will gradually become more and more automated so these measures will be built-in and undefeatable by the owner).
Loading...
This just is not going to happen and as the government’s already gone who is going to implement it? people need to stop listening to all this nonsense. This is what’s coming and it’s already started to be implemented.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDWRdj1M8ik?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en-US&autohide=2&wmode=transparent&w=1024&h=576] Loading...
‘and don’t forget at the moment, we have a 10% plus 2 miles per hour leeway, to account for the accuracy of your speedometer, (10%), and the accuracy with which you can view your speedometer, (2 mph). I guess this will go, not to mention your right to challenge any fine, (eg, it may be safer to accelerate out of danger and break the limit in some circumstances and a court would likely take this into consideration, but the ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY cannot cope with this of course.
Loading...
Just drive at 25km everywhere
Loading...@NoChit I am English, so what has 25km to do with me?
Loading...